If we aren’t willing to end the War on Drugs, can we at
least agree to try some new tactics? We could let science and history inform
our fight to keep Americans safe from harmful substances, to guide us in
designing strategies to reach that worthy goal. That is our goal, right? Isn’t
the end game of this decades-long war supposed to be the safety and health of
the citizenry? To what low point must we descend to admit that we are getting
our asses whipped in this war? Drug use has remained relatively stable over the
past several decades; wouldn’t drug use be going down if we were winning this
multi-trillion dollar war?
Can’t we just agree, as science indicates, that a certain
percentage of the population has a tendency toward addiction, and then admit that
those people may be most helped by mental health professionals and not law
enforcement professionals? Why don’t we just help the people who have addiction
problems and leave the rest of the citizens alone to manage their own lives?
Then we will have to wrestle with the question of what to do
with the addicts who can’t or won’t avail themselves of healthcare services.
Shouldn’t the solution be dictated by the degree their addictive behavior
affects other members of society? As the saying goes, you can lead a horse to
water but you can’t make it drink. As long as the horse isn’t kicking up a fuss
and causing trouble shouldn’t he be left alone until he gets thirsty? We do it
with alcohol addicts all the time. As long as they don’t put someone else in
danger by driving or some other hazardous activity, we pretty much just let
drunks alone to wallow in their own misery. We don’t jail them for the simple
reason that they are addicted to alcohol, we wait until their behavior
infringes on another person’s health or safety. Once again, isn’t the goal of
this war to keep people safe?
Even if we agree that we should treat addicts instead of
jailing them, you may wonder about the drug dealers who prey on the addicts. My
solution to that would be to bring the production and distribution networks
above board where they can have regulation and oversight. This is where we can
learn from history, which teaches us that when alcohol was prohibited a violent
black market rose up to fill the void that legal distributors and home brewers
once filled. Who hasn’t heard of Al Capone? People didn’t stop drinking alcohol
during prohibition. Rich people did it where they always did it: in their homes
and private clubs. Poor people drank in speakeasies where they were more likely
to be introduced to heroin and other drugs. Young men and women acted like
young men and women and took prohibition as a challenge to try something
forbidden.
The parallels of alcohol prohibition to the War on Drugs are
so staggering that we must logically question what the prosecution of that “war”
can teach us about the current “war”. How,
for instance, would ending marijuana prohibition and regulating its sale in storefronts
be any different than it is for alcohol in liquor stores? When was the last
time you stopped by a convenience store and found yourself caught in the
crossfire between the Coors and the Budweiser salesmen? Did they have real
guns, or were they using price tag labelers? Is there something inherently
different about marijuana that would make a pot store more dangerous than a
liquor store? Wouldn’t you agree that Americans are safer buying their Pinot
Grigio or Old Kentucky Bourbon from the corner store instead of a guy selling
homemade rot gut out of a van down by the river?
I challenge you, if you disagree with me, to either convince
me there is a better way to protect citizens from harmful drugs than bringing
it out in the daylight where addicts can get treatment and the other 90% of the
people can take it or leave it, or sell me on the idea that we are winning the
War on Drugs. Go
Photo from Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/03/20/marijuana-raids-are-more-deadly-than-the-drug-itself/?utm_term=.0bc9a3da67cf
To follow this page click on Web Version.
Photo from Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/03/20/marijuana-raids-are-more-deadly-than-the-drug-itself/?utm_term=.0bc9a3da67cf
To follow this page click on Web Version.
I agree look forward to reading more post
ReplyDeleteHave you sent this to your law makers? Good job by the way!
ReplyDeleteThis one's a pearl!
ReplyDeleteWell thank you, Kimberly! Please follow my blog and share it with your friends.
ReplyDeleteGreat article. Now to figure out how to get the legislators up to speed. The decades of propaganda go deep. - Toni Samanie
ReplyDeleteI agree, Toni. It is hard to overcome years of thinking. We all need to hold our beliefs up to questioning every now and then. Maybe if we keep speaking truth to power we can turn this mess around!
DeleteYou really need to be in politics sis!
ReplyDeleteYou need to be in politics!
ReplyDeleteHa ha, Belinda. This is as close as I'm getting. Politics is a nasty business. Thanks for reading! Please follow my blog and share it with your friends.
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree! It should be legalized across cross the board & taxed just like alcohol and tobacco! It would sure help people like me w/ chronic pain issues. (& other medical issues)
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree! It should be legalized across the board & taxed just like alcohol and tobacco! It would sure help people suffering w/ medical conditions such as myself.
ReplyDeleteSmart & thoughtful Debbie. I am so proud of you for starting this blog and putting your amazing ideas and insights together in a place where they can be appreciated and potentially impact change where needed. Keep up the good work!
ReplyDelete